Abstract: |
Date palm fiber (DPF) has been reported to have many advantages when used in concrete, how-ever, its major disadvantage is that it causes a reduction in compressive strength. In this research, powdered activated carbon (PAC) was added to cement in the DPF-reinforced concrete (DPFRC) to lessen the loss in strength. PAC has not been properly utilized as an additive in fiber reinforced concrete even though it has been reported to enhance the properties of cementitious composites. Response surface methodology (RSM) has also been utilized for experimental design, model de-velopment, results analysis, and optimization. The variables were DPF and PAC as additions each at proportions of 0%, 1%, 2%, and 3% by weight of cement. Slump, fresh density, mechanical strengths, and water absorption were the responses that were considered. From the results, both DPF and PAC decreased the workability of the concrete. DPF addition improved the splitting ten-sile and flexural strengths and reduced the compressive strength, and up to 2 wt% PAC addition enhanced the concrete’s strength and lowered the water absorption. The proposed models using RSM were extremely significant and have excellent predictive power for the concrete’s aforementioned properties. Each of the models was further validated experimentally and was found to have an average error of less than 5.5%. According to the results of the optimization, the optimal mix of 0.93 wt% DPF and 0.37 wt% PAC as cement additives resulted in the best properties of the DPFRC in terms of workability, strength, and water absorption. The optimization’s outcome received a 91% desirability rating. The addition of 1% PAC increased the 28-day compressive strength of the DPFRC containing 0%, 1% and 2% DPF by 9.67%, 11.13% and 5.5% respectively. Similarly, 1% PAC addition enhanced the 28-day split tensile strength of the DPFRC containing 0%, 1% and 2% by 8.54%, 11.08% and 19.3% respectively. Likewise, the 28-day flexural strength of DPFRC containing 0%, 1%, 2% and 3% improved by 8.3%, 11.15%, 18.7% and 6.73% respectively with the addition of 1% PAC. Lastly, 1% PAC addition led to a reduction in the water absorption of DPFRC containing 0% and 1% DPF by 17.93% and 12.2% respectively.
|
|
|